How does horror affect people

William Hall, first Black person to receive Victoria Cross. Premature baby born at 21 weeks sets record. Homeowner issues cautionary tale.

The Climate Barometer. Canada's Most Trusted News. Download the CTV News app now. Produce industry warns of potential shortages as supply chain issues mount. Enjoy your guac while you still can: Why some chefs are smashing the avocado trend. If a child watched horror movies in which someone thinks it is okay to kill others, they child is more susceptible to thinking that it is okay in real life, causing the child to act out.

I am in no way saying that every child that watches a horror movie will become a killer, but it is just more of a risk to allow kids at a young age to watch horror movies. Overall, horror movies do have different effects on different people. This was a really interesting post! I myself personally love scary movies and Halloween is one of my favorite holidays.

I think the actual of place of where a person watches these scary movies can be a factor on how it effects us. Just like how you talked about how it depends on who you watch the movie with, I Think your location plays a big part as well.

If you are watching a scary movie during the day, it may not really effect you, but if you are in a dark scary kind of setting, you will be setting the mood to be pretty scared. This was a great post!!! I really like this post, I feel that the excitation transfer process happens to me.

I agree with you about the physocological effects of these movie gender and specially because what the producers are looking for is the connection between what is happening on the movie and our daily life situations. That triggers experiences from viewers that makes them feel anxious and stressed. This is a really interesting topic. I liked how you touched upon the fact that your viewing experience has a lot to do with how your viewing partner is effected by it.

Kanye West returns to the music scene with his much-anticipated album Donda. Cancel reply. Your email address will not be published. Hello everyone, as I was assigned to review this article, I found some of these comments quite disturbing. Horror movies do create anxiety, but we often forget that in the moment we watch them due to an adrenilane rushes, creating a natural high.

Your symptoms are normal. For coping I recommend breathing deeply, reading, not being exposed to blue light light that comes from a screen and reading. You could also try drinking warm tea or milk. No coffee! Do not eat close to bed. Hope this helps any of you! My Mother would never allow me to watch horror films as a child. She was a bartender, and while I was home alone at night I would watch Unsolved Mysteries.

One night I called her up balling my eyes out terrified that someone would break into my house. As I caught wind of a burglary down the street. Later in life, ages I smoked marijuana like it was going out of style and watched occasional horror movies. But I will say, that my relationship arguments with my girlfriend had resulted in behaviors that were quite violent and fierce.

No one can say why exactly, or that the horror films contributed, but mimicking our personal environments is quite prevalent. And an individual can definitely make horror films their personal environment.

I truly believe that in every situation, the goal is to divide and conquer an individual to extract goods. The Bible is a book about what happens to a community if certain things are allowed to pass without personal responsibility being taken.

This being said, Hollywood is a place of its own commandments and laws. As has the church. Everything has laws and levels. Now, from ages I entered the U. Marine Corps. I can recall the cold feeling I first felt wash over me when they handed me a M rifle. But upon firing it, realized it was actually quite an experience.

To wrap up what I was originally saying, Hollywood probably performs a great deal of activities that will keep you from sleeping at night. But it can also be very giving. So you may want to ask yourself, do I want to invite that into my psychology? And if so, could the fears postpone my own personal management and success in life? In the end, life is a battle for your soul and mine. There is never a wrong or right. By any means necessary. But there is a life span, and a city cat will never be as well kept and long lasting as a loyal dog.

What you may want to ask yourself is, what are my priorities, what are my options, and will these films hinder my confidence when taking those bigger steps…. As The Great Gatsby states before opening, a life lived in fear is a life half lived. Just know these people go both ways and they have no boundaries. And it is through both the light and the dark, that they can offer you such a rich memorable experience.

And Ignorance. Words are weapons, so is music, I suggest all you beautiful ones really learn how to use it. So seducive, so illusive, poof.

Hi everyone I hope you are all well. Horror movies have a negative impact on the psychology of the viewers. It makes viewers see shadows and fear from everything without any reason.

The stimulation is not always auditory and can be visual or tactile. The acoustic startle reflex describes an in involuntary eyeblink, measured at the orbicularis oculi muscle via EMG, in response to this noise. The startle reflex can be potentiated when individuals anticipate danger Grillon et al. When people watch fear-related or violent films, the blink magnitude SR is larger than when people watch films with sexual content Jansen and Frijda, , neutral content Koukounas and McCabe, , or sad content Kreibig et al.

The startle reflex is also greater when people watch unpleasant slides — and smallest when people watch pleasant slides Vrana et al.

Roy et al. The SR is higher when people recall fear-related sentences than when recalling neutral sentences Vrana and Lang, and is higher when people are exposed to negative stimuli than positive or neutral stimuli Cook et al.

Fear, however, is the stimulus that creates the greatest SR Bradley et al. Some studies find that a SR does not occur to some types of negative stimuli such as mutilation or surgery Stanley and Knight, The startle effect is a highly replicable behavioral phenomenon and can be reduced with the administration on anxiolytics and when lesions are made to the amygdala Hitchcock and Davis, ; Angrilli et al.

It would be instructive to study whether those high and low in empathy or sensation seeking see below and whether individuals who like horror film and those who dislike horror film would generate different SRs. Suspense and resolution of suspense are two important components of horror and our response to horror film.

The tension created during the feeling of suspense can arise from events, which signify conflict, dissonance, and instability Lehne and Koelsch, When a threat is resolved, our negative affect converts to euphoria and suspense ends.

If the resolution does not occur, then residual negative affect will lead to increased dysphoria. If there is no suspense but a complete certainty about what will happen, suspense is replaced by dread Oliver, a , b. Very few studies have tested the theory, although limited reviews provide some support for the model Hoffner and Levine, Zillmann et al. They found that liking of the film increased as suspense increased.

Liking was especially great when the threat was overcome, but the relationship between fear and liking was not examined in the study.

Individuals high in empathy will express more negative affect regardless of a successful resolution to the threat in the film Zillmann et al.

There is also evidence that enjoyment of horror may not be affected by the availability of resolution and that unresolved horror is perceived as just as enjoyable as resolved horror Hoffner and Cantor, This model, the uses and gratification theory of film consumption Katz et al. Some research suggests that certain personality types and individuals who are high or low on some psychological traits may seek out horror or violent material for gratification but that the material itself may not always provide this satisfaction see the Individual Differences section below.

Zillmann has argued that a positive outcome for the protagonist and a poor one for the antagonist are the key predictors of satisfaction with a film. If neither occurs but a threat is removed, this would also lead to a satisfactory experience, but the experience would be diluted.

There is no consistent evidence to support this view and the success of films where the threat is still very much present in some way at the end of a horror film e. It has been proposed that arousal itself might be self-rewarding — the act of watching horror provides us with a thrill regardless of the resolution and we like and enjoy the film for this reason Tamborini, The pleasurable experience of arousal motivates us to continue watching in order to sustain that level of arousal, as Berlyne suggests.

Sparks and Spirek , for example, found a positive correlation between skin conductance a physiological measure of emotional arousal and self-reported arousal in people who watched a clip of A Nightmare On Elm Street , suggesting that the arousal we report also correlates at the physiological level, although whether the psychophysiological changes determine the arousal or the cognitive and emotional arousals the interpretation of the material determine the psychophysiological changes is an argument, which dates back to James.

Other individual differences include age and sex considered later. Unless a person expresses an interest and liking of horror, the response to graphic violence tends not to be positive. Weaver and Wilson , for example, assigned people to one of three groups who watched either clips from five television programs showing graphic violence, clips with the violence sanitized, or clips with the violence removed.

A meta-analysis of the enjoyment of media violence not horror film specifically found that greater selective exposure to violence i. The implication of this finding appears to be that even though individuals may seek out exposure to violent media, they do not often enjoy what they find. In addition, participants may vary according to the degree of material they are routinely exposed to. When graduate nursing students and psychology students were shown videos of graphic medical procedures, for example, the nurses expressed less disgust and fear but more sadness Vlahou et al.

Both groups, however, showed evidence of psychophysiological arousal measured via Galvanic Skin Response in response to watching the procedures. The most widely studied trait in the research on horror is sensation seeking. It peaks in the teenage years and declines thereafter Zuckerman, In the original conception of the model Zuckerman, , individuals thought to be high sensation seekers would experience much more positive emotion when highly aroused and stimulated and would seek negative stimulation to maximize their arousal because this stimulation was intense.

A negative stimulus such as a horror film might, therefore, be interpreted by a person high in sensation seeking as being very positive; but a person low in sensation-seeking would find the stimulus unpleasant. High sensation-seeking individuals would also be less vulnerable to the experience of threat in these films Franken et al. All four factors of the sensation-seeking scale have been found to predict enjoyment of horror film to some extent, but some factors are better predictors than others.

For example, disinhibition was found by Edwards to be the strongest predictor, followed by experience seeking, thrill and adventure seeking, and boredom susceptibility. Edwards reported a positive correlation between high sensation seeking in general and interest in horror film.

Tamborini and Stiff found a positive correlation between liking for horror and a combination of the sensation-seeking factors. Zuckerman and Litle found that frequency of horror film attendance correlated with disinhibition, thrill and adventure seeking, and boredom susceptibility, but in men only. The sex difference in this study highlights an important constraint on the model, and that is, individual differences such as sex may interact with sensation-seeking type to predict viewing, preference for, or enjoyment of horror film see below.

Cantor and Sparks found that sensation seeking was positively correlated with the enjoyment of frightening films in men and women.

However, components of sensation seeking predicted enjoyment differently — thrill and adventure seeking were the best predictor for men, whereas disinhibition was the best predictor for women. Other studies have reported no positive correlation between sensation seeking and liking and enjoyment for horror films Neuendorf and Sparks, Aluja-Fabregat found that disinhibition and psychopathy — a personality trait which describes a charming, remorseless, callous, and manipulative personality type — correlated with curiosity about morbid events in eighth graders in Catalan.

Sensation seeking correlated with consumption of violent films and consumption was associated with psychopathy, specifically in boys. In a study of the enjoyment of fear experiences in video gaming, Lynch and Martins found that in their sample of 18—year-old players, men reported more enjoyment of violent video games and played more games and played more often.

Low empathizers also played more but did not play more frequently. Agency in such games, however, appears to be important to the experience of the medium. There were no differences between the two groups in self-reported fear. While sensation seeking might be strongly associated with enjoyment of horror, it may not be the strongest predictor of attendance at horror films.

Also of note is that there is evidence that sensation seeking is related to the startle potentiation described earlier. Lissek and Powers found that people low in sensation seeking as measured via the thrill and adventure-seeking subscale produced the typical startle potentiation during the viewing of threatening vs. One explanation for this finding is that high levels of sensation seeking are related to low levels of reactivity to threatening images.

Because high sensation seeking involves a degree of sensory overload, less stimulation is required for a startle potentiation to occur and those scoring high in sensation seeking show less fear startle potentiation. The literature on sensation seeking, therefore, suggests that this trait and specific components of it, especially disinhibition, may predict enjoyment of horror film, but this prediction does not apply to men and women consistently a conclusion considered in more detail in the section on sex differences below.

The literature also highlights a limitation in this — and other areas — of the horror research literature in that samples are often heterogeneous, the film selections are heterogeneous, and sample sizes tend to be small. These limitations are returned to at the end of the review. Empathy is a multidimensional concept whose components have been defined in different ways but which in general are reflected in two types: a cognitive component e.

One model suggests that empathy comprises a wandering imagination a tendency to fantasize and daydream about fictional situations , fictional involvement transposition of oneself into a story , humanistic mentation a sensitivity to the emotional welfare of others , and emotional contagion a susceptibility to be influenced by the emotions around oneself Tamborini et al.

Davis , who originally developed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, argued that empathy was not a unitary or binary concept but was best considered as a set of constructs, which involve our reactions to others but are distinct from each other. These constructs included perspective taking, a fantasy scale which measures the degree to which a person transposes themselves into the feelings or actions of fictional characters , empathetic concern which measures the degree of sympathy felt for others , and personal distress a description of unease or distress experienced in interpersonal relationships.

There is evidence that each component can predict enjoyment of horror film, with low empathy consistently associated with greater enjoyment. In one study Tamborini et al. Those scoring high on the wandering item, fictional involvement, humanistic mentation, and contagion scales described above found graphic horror less appealing.

Those scoring low in empathy preferred graphic horror. People low in fearfulness also prefer graphic horror Mundorf et al. In a variant of this procedure, Tamborini et al. If they received a reply, the responses would be rejected. Those participants scoring high in fictional involvement and empathetic concern provided more comfort and more social support.

Those who watched the horror film, however, provided less support than did those who watched the comedy. Empathy has also been associated with less enjoyment of suffering displayed in frightening films but with more enjoyment of danger, of excitement, and of happy endings Hoffner, People high in enduring negative affect have been found to experience more distress and less enjoyment of suffering.

Those who had prior exposure to frightening films enjoyed danger more and enjoyed happy endings less. Johnston , for example, notes that not all audiences respond to horror in the same way, as this section has demonstrated and has typologized viewers and their motivations to watch into three types: 1 resolved-ending types; 2 thrill watchers; and 3 gore watchers.

Resolved-ending types enjoy film with a satisfying, definite closure; thrill watchers enjoy being frightened and empathize with the principal characters; gore watchers watch because they enjoy the destructiveness in film. The typology is based on some of the research reviewed here. A prediction that can be made from this typology is that thrill watchers will have higher levels of empathy and adventure seeking, whereas gore watchers will be low in empathy and fearfulness but will be high in adventure seeking and will seek out high arousal King and Hourani, Research suggests that gore watchers are curious about the ways people are killed, are vindictive they require satisfaction that characters receive their just desserts , and are attracted to blood and guts gore in film King and Hourani, Gore watchers are more likely to be men, to identify with the killer in films and are less likely to identify with the victim.

King and Hourani identified types of watchers from individuals and showed them four horror films. The traditional ending was more entertaining than was the teaser ending, but it was especially enjoyable and entertaining for high gore and thrill watchers than low gore and thrill watchers.

Traditional endings were less distressing and more frightening for high than low gore watchers and were regarded as being more frightening by high thrill watchers. High thrill watchers found the teaser ending version of the film to be less scary than did low thrill watchers. High gore watchers regarded the teaser to be more predictable than did low thrill watchers. The traditional ending was considered to be less predictable by high gore watchers than by high thrill watchers and by high thrill watchers than by low thrill watchers.

Very little research exists on this typology, however. Although individual studies indicate a relationship between empathy and horror enjoyment, a meta-analysis of studies investigating the enjoyment of mediated fright and violence has found that empathetic concern and personal distress were negatively correlated with enjoyment, but correlations for personal distress were not consistent Hoffner and Levine, The authors note that the inconsistencies may be attributable to differences in the content of the film employed in these studies, and this is a problematic issue common to the field: There are no consistently chosen materials in either nature, content, length, age, or narrative.

When these studies were removed, the correlation between empathy and enjoyment became non-significant. A different form of individual difference — need for affect — may also mediate horror film preference and enjoyment, but the literature is limited. Need for affect Maio and Esses, is based on the assumption that we are motivated to seek interesting or positive experiences and avoid unpleasant ones. Need for Affect NfA is measured via a questionnaire, which comprises two subscales: the tendency to approach and the tendency to withdraw.

People who prefer sad films experience more enjoyment when watching sad films, for example, because they regard viewing sad films as an enjoyable and a gratifying experience; their need for affect is satisfied by watching sad films Oliver, a , b ; Oliver et al. Few studies have explored the relationship between NfA and horror film viewing.

Participants with higher NfA approach scores experienced more intense emotions and experienced more negative emotions such as anger, fear, and disgust. United 93 evoked more negative emotions than did The Omen. Higher NfA withdraw scores were associated with a more negative evaluation of emotions. Controlling for personality did not affect these results significantly. While NfA is little studied in horror, one possible research question that could be explored is whether preference for film genres correlates with NfA; no study to date has systematically examined this relationship.

Other personality traits thought to be implicated in horror film preference or enjoyment include the Big Five, the Dark Tetrad, and repressive coping style. Dark personality traits are those which express some abnormal, sinister, and unpleasant aspect of behavior. Four such traits are Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Psychopathy described earlier , and Sadism. Machiavellianism the enjoyment of power and the manipulation of power has been found to correlate with enjoyment of horror, and the correlations between these two variables are stronger than the correlation between Machiavellianism and sensation seeking Tamborini and Stiff, High psychopathy scores have been associated with preference for graphically violent horror movies Weaver, , and individuals scoring high in callousness and who habitually express little or no emotion show reduced facial expressions of sadness and disgust when watching violent films Fanti et al.

A repressive coping style is characterized by the repression of negative affect caused by stressors Weinberger, ; Sparks et al. Sparks et al. Based on a median split, 30 repressors and 29 non-repressors were identified and were asked to view a min extract from When A Stranger Calls in which a babysitter receives frightening phone calls and discovers that the calls have been coming from inside the house she is in.

Women in general expressed greater negative affect than did men, as expected see section below , but the repressors in general showed greater physiological arousal during the film than did non-repressors. An interesting pattern emerged across the course of exposure.

Physiological arousal was similar for both groups at the beginning of the first two sections of the movie and then diverged in the final three sections as the suspense increased.

No explicit analysis was provided of the psychometric response to the film how much it was liked, how frightening it was, and so on. The study suggests that those who repress negative affect may nonetheless show high levels of physiological arousal during exposure to frightening films. What is less clear in this study is the relationship between this phenomenon and enjoyment of the film. Despite being the most commonly accepted model of personality, the Big Five has been the focus of very little published research in the context of horror film enjoyment and consumption.

The Big Five proposes that personality is comprised of five core traits along which individuals differ. There was a small but statistically significant and positive correlation between extraversion and frequency of horror media use, using horror media with others, enjoying horror media with others and being more scared with others. Agreeableness was positively correlated with being easily scared by horror media, using horror media with others, enjoying horror media with others, and negatively correlated with being more scared with others.

People high in conscientiousness were less scared after using horror media, and people high in emotional stability were found to be less easily scared than those low in emotional stability, a finding which was also reported by Reynaud et al.

The number of participants in Reynaud et al. The finding regarding agreeableness contrasts with research on violent video game playing where people lower in agreeableness have been found to be more frequent violent video games players; individuals who score high in extraversion and openness and low in neuroticism have also been found to be more frequent users Chory and Goodboy, Low agreeableness is a significant predictor of enjoyment of the horror film genre but not exclusively — it is also a significant predictor of enjoyment of parody, animation, neo-noir, and cult genres across different media including books, television, and film Cantador et al.

While the findings of Chory and Goodboy are informative, they are limited in terms of the measurement of response to horror film specifically because the stimuli used were not specifically horror film. A similar limitation can be found in Clasen et al. The study also administered a variant of the Big Five personality inventory and a variant of the sensation-seeking scale Hoyle et al. Although research on violent video games might help understand some of the correlates between use frequency and personality trait, it should be acknowledged that violent video games are qualitatively different stimuli to films.

Films are a passive experience — viewers are unable to influence the action they see on screen — whereas gaming is specifically an active experience where the player engages with what they see and are expected to do so as this is the principal motivation for gaming.

Horror films and horror games are not equivalent stimuli, although they share many characteristics and elements of content. In conclusion, the literature studying the relationship between personality and horror film consumption has been limited in number and scope.

It is noteworthy that in one of the studies reporting an association, agreeableness was the only trait to be significantly associated with horror media use. This aspect of personality may be worth exploring further. Men enjoy horror media more than do women, are less scared by horror media, use horror media more, and show a greater preference for frightening horror media Clasen et al. Men enjoyed the horror more and found it less boring and more satisfying and frightening than did women.

Men expressed more distress if the female companion expressed distress but engaged more with them than with a masterful woman and less if the female companion was masterful. Women engaged more with masterful than with distressed men. Cutting violence from films can increase enjoyability and decrease arousal in women but has no effect on men : women regard these films to be generally more disturbing than do men Berry et al.

Male undergraduates experience less distress and anxiety than do women when watching horror film Sparks, , and women find film clips depicting sadness and fear more unpleasant and distressing; they also show greater arousal to fear clips than to clips depicting compassion Davydov et al.

The findings reflect a more general sex difference in that women, in general, report greater fear and anxiety than do men. Women have been found to express more fears, more severe fears, and greater fear of repulsive but harmless animals Tucker and Bond, , a finding that applies cross-culturally Arrindell et al.

Anxiety disorders are more commonly reported by women than men McLean and Anderson, , and women appear to be more susceptible to variety of anxiety-related disorders such as panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, and agoraphobia Kessler et al.

The exception to this pattern is fear of bodily injury, social stimuli, noise, or enclosed spaces, where no consistent sex differences have been reported McLean and Anderson, Disgust sensitivity — the degree to which individuals find stimuli repulsive — also tends to be higher in women, and this phenomenon might provide an explanation for the sex difference in the fear of animals — and horror film Connolly et al.

This is considered in more detail below. Women and girls, for example, are less likely to enjoy violent media when blood and gore portrayed are described as extreme, rather than mild or moderate Hoffner and Levine, The sex difference is not only reported in the horror genre but also across a number of cinematic genres. In a second study, participants were asked to indicate the films they themselves preferred.

In the first study, men were regarded as preferring action, adventure, erotic, fantasy, historical, horror, sci-fi, thriller, war, and western films, whereas women preferred animation, comedy, drama, heimat, and romantic films. Both sexes liked crime and mystery equally. In the second study, women expressed a preference for drama and romance, and men preferred action, adventure, erotic, fantasy, horror, mystery, sci-fi, war, and Western films.

Animation, comedy, crime heist, history, and thrillers were liked by both sexes. Enjoyment and liking of the degree of explicit graphic horror also appear to show sex differences. Men tend to prefer very graphic horror material more than do women Hoffner and Levine, Men also report watching more violent television and attend more horror films. Such an explanation is probably locked in a prison of its own time in the sense that it is unclear whether such attitudes still exist now, at the end of the second decade of the twenty-first century.

Tamborini et al. In one version, the victim of graphic violence was male; in the other, the victim was female. One theory of horror enjoyment discussed earlier the uses and gratification perspective; Rubin, argues that our reasons for watching horror and the benefit and gratification we derive from it will determine whether we identify with a victim or an aggressor Johnston, Viewers who identify with a female victim are usually more likely to experience distress Zillmann and Cantor, and are not satisfied by happy endings Tannenbaum and Gaer, However, the responses to men and women as victims in the film interacted with other viewing preferences.

Sensation seeking in general did not predict preference for graphic horror. Women regarded the films with female victims to be higher in violent content than films featuring male victims; the opposite pattern was found in men. Boredom susceptibility was a good predictor of preference for graphic horror in men. No one factor was a strong predictor of graphic horror preference in women when the victim was male.

Deceit and boredom susceptibility predicted graphic horror preference when the victim was female.