Which is better kotex or always
We ultimately ordered and bled on hundreds of tampons from 18 different brands representing all five FDA-specified absorbencies. After confirming that the tampons we considered all absorbed the amounts of liquid they were rated to hold, we focused our testing on real-world attributes, including the ease of unwrapping and insertion plus comfort during wear.
We tested tampons from 18 different brands at each absorbency they came in, from light to ultra not all brands included options at all absorbencies. We divided our 11 testers into three test groups: people who preferred non-applicator digital tampons, people who preferred applicator tampons and primarily used light or regular ones during their cycles, and people who preferred applicator tampons and regularly used super, super plus, or ultra tampons during their cycles.
We sent each tester three samples of each tampon of the type they usually used, between 45 and 66 in all per tester. First, testers noted whether each tampon was easy to unwrap and comfortable to insert. Several testers also reported a fear of labia snagging and other discomfort with cardboard applicators.
Second, we asked testers to evaluate comfort during wear. Finally, we posed a simple question to our testers: Would you buy this tampon? In a non-scientific test, we also examined fiber shedding by unwrapping a sample of each tampon type and wiping it on a black cloth, eliminating any contenders that exhibited excessive shedding after repeated trials. We examined the shape of each tampon we tested, both when wet holding water and when allowed to expand dry airing out for a few days.
Because every vagina, and every menstrual flow, is different, some people might find that certain tampon designs are more comfortable than others. Vagina shapes vary , which means that for some people a bell shape will work best while for others a wing design might be more effective.
Tampax Pearl is the only conventional applicator tampon that all of our testers liked regardless of their flows, with testers praising its long, braided string and its sturdy, easy-to-use plastic applicator. Tampax Pearl is also the only line we tested that comes in all five FDA-recognized absorbencies light to ultra. This tampon is more expensive than some conventional applicator options, but we found its superior applicator and wrapper worth investing a few cents more in.
You can find Pearl tampons in almost every store that sells tampons. Many people are concerned about tampon ingredients, and the fact that companies are not currently required to disclose them. A New York law mandating all ingredients be listed on menstrual product packaging is slated to take effect in Its core is made of certified organic cotton, though the packaging and applicator may be no different from those of the Pearl tampon.
The Pure version also performed well on our fiber-shedding test. The Pure ingredients listed there are: polyethylene applicator , organic cotton absorbent core , organic cotton thin fabric veil around absorbent core , polypropylene LeakGuard braid , cotton string , polyester thread , polyethylene wrapper.
Unlike Tampax Pearl, which comes in all absorbencies, Tampax Pure comes in only regular and super. These tampons typically cost about twice as much as the conventional version. Pro Comfort design has a sturdy, long string, and testers found the tampon easy to unwrap.
Although O. Pro Comfort is not marketed as an organic tampon, the cotton that forms the bulk of the wad, the veil that covers that absorbent core, and the string are in fact all organic the thread used to sew the string to the tampon, however, is not. Pro Comfort tampons cost a bit more than the next-closest conventional competition O. Originals , which shed more and our testers liked much less but are just as widely available. Because the packaging is so similar, it is easy to confuse our pick with O.
Original tampons, which in our test shed more fibers than the Pro Comfort version did. Organic applicator-free tampons are virtually the same, and nearly as nice to use, as O.
Pro Comforts tampons, but they cost substantially more. Compared with other organic digital tampons we considered, the O. Organics tampons are generally less expensive, plus more widely available. Like the O. Pro Comforts version, the O. Organics tampons performed well on our fiber-shedding test.
Whereas most organic applicator-free tampons we tried produced only a moderate amount of fuzz, others got pretty cotton-ball-like at the bottom and left behind some chunks of fiber on the string and on our hands. We found O. Organic tampons to be the least sheddy among organic digital competitors they tied with tampons from Rael for this distinction. Tampon manufacturers are not required to disclose exactly what is in their tampons or in what quantities.
But New York is poised to become the first state to mandate that all menstrual product makers disclose all of their ingredients, and many other states are starting to follow suit. A handful of bills have also proposed that the US Congress require tampon manufacturers to disclose the chemicals and processes they use in manufacturing sanitary products.
The ingredients listed there are the same as those noted on Tampax boxes. Solimo, an Amazon brand, forwarded us a screenshot of the side of its tampon box. Other companies chose not to respond at all. However, even organic cotton can be pretty harsh on the environment, and it still requires organic pesticides to grow. Tampon ingredients that tend to give people pause include rayon and dioxins. Rayon: Many tampons are made from a mix of cotton and rayon. Some people worry that synthetic fibers increase the risk of toxic shock syndrome because they were implicated in the TSS boom in the late s, but tampon makers no longer use those particular fibers.
Dioxins: Tampons undergo bleaching during the manufacturing process. This step makes them white in color and also helps remove waxes and anything else that might impede absorption. That means that the process uses no elemental chlorine gas but might include chlorine dioxide. But tampon makers no longer bleach their products with elemental chlorine.
Plus, dioxins are all around in low levels: Meat, dairy, fish, and shellfish all contain dioxins. And nothing we read raised health concerns about the materials in the applicators. You can choose between plastic and cardboard based on other parameters without having to think about safety; your choice should come down to comfort and how you feel about the garbage you produce. Although Tampax claims that its cardboard applicators are biodegradable and flushable, many plumbers disagree.
The only things that should go down a toilet, they say, are the three Ps : pee, poop, and toilet paper. Plastic applicators are not biodegradable or recyclable. The vagina is full of bacteria. On rare occasions, people with vaginas have a natural population of a bacteria strain that results in toxic shock syndrome TSS when it grows unchecked: either Staphylococcus aureus known colloquially as staph , or even more rarely, Streptococcus pyogenes colloquially known as strep. TSS can result from things other than tampons, including menstrual cups.
I've always used always but recently i tried kotex. I found it fit better to my body and was softer and it didn't feel like you were wearing a pad.
Although i like the variety of always better and i heard from others that they found always absorbed better. But recently they have changed their material and it's uncomfortable. I use both though. If I'm lazy and don't want to use tampons. I definitely find the kotex is nicer feeling but i find always has a more variety of lengths and thickness and is absorbs better.
Never used Kotex. I usually use Always. Their Infinity products are fantastic. At Always, your protection and comfort are our priority. We know that having a menstrual pad that fits properly provides you with the period protection you need. Everyone is a unique size and has a unique menstrual flow. A fit based on your shape and flow offers you the best protection and comfort. It is a common misconception among many women that all feminine pads are the same and that they all leak!
Unfortunately, when many women experience a leak they often blame themselves and not their sanitary pad, tampon or period cup. The truth is that a lot of women do not know that leak free periods are possible when finding the right pad coverage. Did you know that pads come in different lengths and front-back coverages to match your specific protection needs?
A longer daytime pad or using a specially designed night time pad can increase the coverage front to back and reduce leaks. The Always products are designed to fit different body shapes and sizes and to provide protection for all types of period flows from a light flow to a very heavy flow. Whether you prefer a sanitary pad with wings or without wings, thick pads Always Maxi pads or thin pads Always Infinity , Always Radiant , and Always Ultra Thin , or day or overnight protection , there are several options of pads to choose from to fit your shape and flow.
0コメント